Skip to main content

The first new thing from the annual

This past Friday afternoon I went out to the shop where my plane is currently undergoing its annual inspection. I needed to take the logbooks out there, and I also wanted to take a look at the plane while the cowling was off. While I was there, I spoke with one of the mechanics who was working on a 150 or 152 (I can't remember which) that needed a replacement cylinder. That plane was sitting nose-to-nose with mine, so we also spoke about my plane for a while.

He pointed out something that I'm going to have taken care of. A couple of the fuel hoses do not have that orange fire-retardant sleeve on them that it's a good idea to have. It's not something that will ground the plane, as it was certainly like that at the last annual. It is, however, more than a nice-to-have thing. Fortunately, installation of sleeves on those lines will be relatively easy and inexpensive and I plan to have them do it.

The mechanic also noted that he has considerable time in Musketeers and admires them for their robust construction. I could have talked about plane with him all day, but I needed to go do other things (not to mention my wife was with me and I didn't think she'd want to spend the rest of the day there) so I headed out. As the mechanic had reached a point on the cylinder replacement where he couldn't do anything else at the moment, he said he'd start removing the interior of my plane next.

I'm definitely concerned about the metal found in the oil. In my previous post I mentioned an incident where I accidentally turned the ignition completely off during my run-up and wondered if that could have caused this. After thinking about it some more, I remembered how engines work and realized that it almost certainly didn't. I was thinking that, if the ignition was off, more fuel was in the cylinder when it came back on and caused a brief spike in cylinder pressure. But, of course, if a fuel-air charge is not burned in the cylinder during a cycle, it will be blown out the exhaust valve and not remain in the cylinder. What I experienced was almost certainly a standard and common case of some fuel burning in the exhaust pipe. While it's a relief to realize that, it does mean the actual cause is unknown at this time. So we'll continue with the current plan to check it again after five hours or so.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Approaching the annual

I know I haven't been posting much, but that's mainly because nothing much of note has been happening. I've been flying, but not really going anywhere in particular. The engine continues to run very well, and the plane is still solid. I was hoping to do more "destination" flying this year but, for whatever reason(s), it didn't really happen. Next year, hopefully.... On the horizon, though, is the annual inspection. It's already scheduled for mid-December, since the last annual is good to the end of that month. I've also arranged for it to be an owner-assisted annual. I'm told that every airplane owner should do this at least once and I can certainly understand why that is the case, even before I do it. I will be learning about my airplane in a way that nothing else will match and, incidentally, save some money at the same time. I'm looking forward to it. Leading up to the annual, I have been compiling a list of squawks that I want to take care ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thwarted

The plane is done being fixed again. Well, for the most part, but I'll get to that. The vacuum pump had indeed failed, so they replaced it. They also replaced the starboard fuel sump drain valve. Interestingly, I received an email yesterday from the shop with an invoice attached. It was for a credit to my account, which they gave me because they drained the fuel from the right tank. The invoice notes that 16 gallons were removed. The tank's capacity is almost 30 gallons, and I had filled it almost full on Sunday before my flight. So either they didn't credit me for all of the fuel in the tank, or it had continued to leak and had lost about 12 or so gallons over the course of a few days. I don't know which, but I'm not going to worry too much about it. I went out today to put some Camguard in the oil, run the engine, and possibly even go for a flight if the weather was nice enough. The grass runway and temporary taxiway are open so limited flight operations can proce...
2 comments
Read more

Adding to the list

As noted in my previous post, my landing light isn't working anymore. The most likely reason is that the bulb simply burned out. It's an OG incandescent bulb. I don't know how old it is; I could probably go through the logs to see if it was ever replaced but I don't feel like it right now. I called up the shop and added this to the list of items to be addressed when they can get to it. I also inquired as to whether or not it makes sense to upgrade it to an LED bulb. As I understand it, there are LED bulbs available that are drop-in replacements. They cost a few hundred dollars, whereas a regular incancescent bulb is less than twenty. At some point in the next day or two the shop manager should be giving me a call so we can discuss the options. On an unrelated topic, I forgot to mention something in my previous post. My flight with my wife was the first time I used shot bags I purchased for ballast. With my wife and me in the front seats, and 40 gallons of fuel in the ta...
Post a Comment
Read more