Skip to main content

Moar flying!

The other day I returned from a week-long trip to Arizona to visit my father for his 90th birthday. This is why I hadn't flown my plane since its first post-overhaul flight that lasted only half an hour. Before I came home, I called up the shop and was told that they had indeed taken the plane in and checked it out, and that it was good to go for the full break-in process.

Yesterday the weather was quite nice. It was cold, but still above freezing. So I took the afternoon and went flying for a couple of hours. Since I'm still at the beginning of the break-in period, I flew it at 75% power for an hour, then varied the power between 65% and 75% for another hour. Once I was done I landed and put it away.

When I was pushing the plane back into the hangar, I noticed that one of the screws holding the spinner on had worked itself about half way out. I tightened it up as best I could with the little multi-tool I carry around, and planned to tighten it fully the next time I was out there. I also decided to wait to check the oil level until later so it had time to cool and flow down into the sump and provide an accurate reading.

At this point, I'm not exactly sure what I should do. I need to look it up again, and also chat with Preston to get his advice. What I did yesterday was basically what the Lycoming service bulletin regarding engine break-in says to do for the first test flight. However, the first test flight was, as Preston instructed, only half an hour. So I'm not sure if I should continue to fly it in the same manner as I did yesterday, or if I should now be able to fly it however I want while continuing to monitor oil usage. I do know that, in general, I should continue to use mineral oil for 20 hours or so, or until oil usage stabilizes. There's documentation I've seen before, I just need to look it up again.

So today I went out to the airport to check the oil level and tighten that screw properly. I took a small screwdriver kit out and used it to tighten the screw that had been loose, then I made sure all of the rest of them were tight as well. Then I checked the oil level, which read 6.5 quarts. It was about what I expected.

Back when I was first going to fly it, but then decided not to because I was just too tired, the oil level read about 6 quarts when I checked it. When I told Preston I wasn't going to fly that day, I also told him the oil reading. He had one of his line personnel put some oil in it so it was ready to go the next day when I did fly it. Before that flight, it was almost at 8 quarts.

Before the flight yesterday, it was at 7 quarts, so a full quart was consumed during that first short flight. It's not surprising, actually. It's also possible that some was blown out. The current wisdom on the Beech Aero Club is that this will happen if you fill it to 8 quarts. Yesterday's flight appeared to consume only half a quart, and that for a flight four times as long. I expect that part of that dramatic reduction in oil consumption rate is due to the rings becoming properly seated, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of the oil consumed during the first flight came out elsewhere as folks on the BAC forum say it will. Regardless, it seems to me that only half a quart during a two hour flight when the engine is still this fresh is not bad at all.

The weather is now crappy, and the forecast for the next week or so is not promising. It's possible that it will be nice enough to go flying again before the end of the year, but I'm not expecting it to be. So I'm really glad I was able to take it up yesterday.

There is one thing I want them to check the next time it's in the shop. My plane has always pulled to the left a bit while flying at cruise. How much depends on the power setting. If I'm running at about 2450 rpm or so, it's not bad, and the ball is almost centered. However, during these last two flights, it's been worse. I don't know if the rigging of the rudder was altered at all during this process. I doubt it, since it shouldn't have been affected by any engine work, and it's unlikely it was touched during the annual inspection. However, it's possible that the nosewheel centering spring and cable isn't quite centered. That was all disassembled in order to pull the engine mount off for refurbishment, so it could be that it needs adjustment. Because the nosewheel is connected to the rudder pedals for steering, if it's not properly centered it could definitely be pulling the rudder to the left a bit. It's not bad enough to keep me from flying, it's just something I have to be aware of.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Predicting the weather is hard

At least, it's hard for this region of the country. I like to say that predicting the weather for the Puget Sound region is far more an art than it is a science. Early last week, the weather forecast was for pretty much crappy weather for the foreseeable future. However, because of the chaotic nature of the atmosphere around here, especially at this time of year, the forecast is always subject to change. As it turns out, the weather was actually nice enough last Friday afternoon (December 17) that I was able to go up for about an hour and a half. One of the reasons I went up was because I had filled the tanks after the previous flight, and I wanted to burn off some fuel in case I was able to take my father flying while we visiting from Arizona. As I'm sure I've mentioned, the weight and balance of my plane is such that I'd be over maximum weight if I had a passenger in the front seat, the required ballast in the baggage compartment to stay within the forward CG limit, a...

A digression, if I may...

The other night, after almost 50 years, the Saturn V was dethroned as the most powerful rocket ever successfully launched by humanity. I use the word "successfully" because the Soviet N1 rocket actually generated more thrust at liftoff, but all four launch attempts ended in failure. For the first time since Apollo 17, a true moon rocket lifted off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, carrying a spacecraft capable of carrying humans back to the moon. This Artemis mission is a test flight, so no astronauts are on board the Orion spacecraft. Despite that, it was a spectacular launch. Because the SLS launch vehicle has a higher thrust-to-weight ratio than the Saturn V, it rose from the launch pad much more quickly than it's predecessor. I think it's a bit heavier than the Space Shuttle, but it has more thrust due to an additional RS-25 engine, and more powerful solid rocket boosters. Watching it rise into the night sky, I was excited, but also a bit melancholy. This was ...

Approaching the annual

I know I haven't been posting much, but that's mainly because nothing much of note has been happening. I've been flying, but not really going anywhere in particular. The engine continues to run very well, and the plane is still solid. I was hoping to do more "destination" flying this year but, for whatever reason(s), it didn't really happen. Next year, hopefully.... On the horizon, though, is the annual inspection. It's already scheduled for mid-December, since the last annual is good to the end of that month. I've also arranged for it to be an owner-assisted annual. I'm told that every airplane owner should do this at least once and I can certainly understand why that is the case, even before I do it. I will be learning about my airplane in a way that nothing else will match and, incidentally, save some money at the same time. I'm looking forward to it. Leading up to the annual, I have been compiling a list of squawks that I want to take care ...