Skip to main content

The heat is on

As I noted in my previous post, I went flying this past Saturday. What I neglected to include is that it was the hottest temperature that I've ever flown in. It was already 90 degrees Fahrenheit when I got to the airport. That's 32 Celsius for my metric-inclined readers.

I actually opened the POH and checked the performance numbers before I started my preflight inspection. I was already pretty confident that Ariel could do it with no problems, but I wanted to make extra sure. The book said it was okay, though the takeoff roll would be a hundred or so feet longer than in past flights, but Harvey Field has a long enough runway. In addition, I knew that I'd be about 350 lbs. below maximum weight, and the chart assumes you're at the max.

When I did take off, the plane performed just fine, and I had no problems clearing obstacles and making the noise-abatement turn that is requested when taking off from runway 33. In fact, the plane seemed to perform more or less normally, and I didn't notice much performance degradation. I'm sure it was there, and I always kept it in mind, but I didn't have any issues.

As I flew around, I was tuning in to various airports' automated weather systems to get altimeter settings. With it being as hot as it was, they were including the density altitude in the report. For the most part, it was about 2200' above field elevation. Not too bad, but it still makes a difference.

When I came in for landing, I knew that everything was going to be just a bit faster. When flying in the pattern, you want to be flying at specific airspeeds at different points in the pattern. That airspeed, however, is the indicated airspeed. It's determined essentially by the pressure of the air in the pitot tube. However, since the air is less dense when it's hot, that pressure is less for a given true airspeed. This means that the true airspeed will be higher when it's hot than when it's not.

Keeping that in mind, I did what I think was a better than normal (for me) job at managing my airspeed. This led to a rather nice landing, if I do say so myself. I've been working on making my landings more consistent, and "prettier", for lack of a better word. I think I've figured a couple of refinements to my technique, mainly around throttle control, that I think will improve them. If last Saturday was any indication, I'm on the right track.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Predicting the weather is hard

At least, it's hard for this region of the country. I like to say that predicting the weather for the Puget Sound region is far more an art than it is a science. Early last week, the weather forecast was for pretty much crappy weather for the foreseeable future. However, because of the chaotic nature of the atmosphere around here, especially at this time of year, the forecast is always subject to change. As it turns out, the weather was actually nice enough last Friday afternoon (December 17) that I was able to go up for about an hour and a half. One of the reasons I went up was because I had filled the tanks after the previous flight, and I wanted to burn off some fuel in case I was able to take my father flying while we visiting from Arizona. As I'm sure I've mentioned, the weight and balance of my plane is such that I'd be over maximum weight if I had a passenger in the front seat, the required ballast in the baggage compartment to stay within the forward CG limit, a...
1 comment
Read more

A digression, if I may...

The other night, after almost 50 years, the Saturn V was dethroned as the most powerful rocket ever successfully launched by humanity. I use the word "successfully" because the Soviet N1 rocket actually generated more thrust at liftoff, but all four launch attempts ended in failure. For the first time since Apollo 17, a true moon rocket lifted off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, carrying a spacecraft capable of carrying humans back to the moon. This Artemis mission is a test flight, so no astronauts are on board the Orion spacecraft. Despite that, it was a spectacular launch. Because the SLS launch vehicle has a higher thrust-to-weight ratio than the Saturn V, it rose from the launch pad much more quickly than it's predecessor. I think it's a bit heavier than the Space Shuttle, but it has more thrust due to an additional RS-25 engine, and more powerful solid rocket boosters. Watching it rise into the night sky, I was excited, but also a bit melancholy. This was ...
1 comment
Read more

Approaching the annual

I know I haven't been posting much, but that's mainly because nothing much of note has been happening. I've been flying, but not really going anywhere in particular. The engine continues to run very well, and the plane is still solid. I was hoping to do more "destination" flying this year but, for whatever reason(s), it didn't really happen. Next year, hopefully.... On the horizon, though, is the annual inspection. It's already scheduled for mid-December, since the last annual is good to the end of that month. I've also arranged for it to be an owner-assisted annual. I'm told that every airplane owner should do this at least once and I can certainly understand why that is the case, even before I do it. I will be learning about my airplane in a way that nothing else will match and, incidentally, save some money at the same time. I'm looking forward to it. Leading up to the annual, I have been compiling a list of squawks that I want to take care ...
Post a Comment
Read more