Skip to main content

Over the hills and far away

This past Monday, which was Memorial Day here in the United States, I did something I've been wanting to do for some time. I flew over the Cascade mountains. My destination was Bowers Field in Ellensburg, WA. My goal was to accomplish the following:

  • Verify that I could, indeed, fly over the Cascades to eastern Washington.
  • Get some experience at flying at higher altitudes.
  • Get a feel for how my airplane performs at those altitudes.

I used FlyQ to generate a VFR flight plan and filed it after a couple of course tweaks. I left the altitudes at the suggested values. I filed the flight plan before leaving for the airport, then activated it right before takeoff using the Leidos EasyActivate™ Service. For those unfamiliar with this process, Leidos is the company that manages many of the flight services functions for the FAA, including filing, activating, and closing flight plans. If you have your account set up correctly, they send you an email when you file a flight plan. It contains a link you can click or tap to open their website where you can quickly activate your plan. They will then send you another email with a link you can use to close the plan. It's a really slick system that wasn't available back when I did my training, and it's well suited for use with your phone.

My cruising altitude for the flight to Ellensburg was 9,500'. As I expected, it took a while to reach that altitude, especially as I was performing a cruise climb to keep the airspeed up and engine temperature down. Even with the significant reduction in climb rate, I reached that altitude with no real difficulty and settled in for the cruise portion of the flight. The mixture control in my airplane is, shall we say, imprecise. Although I like the lever-style throttle quadrant, I definitely see the advantage of a vernier-style mixture control with it's higher precision. Nevertheless, I was able to cruise along at about 2500 rpm, consuming less than 10 gph, and doing about 100 knots TAS. The wind at that altitude was calm so the ground speed indicated on my iPad was close to that on my airspeed indicator.

At about 20 nm from Bowers Field, I started my descent. That worked out pretty well from a timing standpoint and I arrived at the field at about 1000 ft. above pattern altitude. I flew over the field to determine wind direction, then circled around to enter the left traffic pattern for a landing on runway 29.

The landing was pretty good, if I may say so. I didn't do a touch and go, but taxied off the runway and then back to the end for take off. Bowers is at 1800' MSL so the takeoff roll was a bit longer than at Harvey, but it also has a 4300' runway so I had plenty of room. I climbed out, then trimmed for an initial 500 fpm climb rate up to my target altitude for the return trip. As I was now on a heading between 180 and 360 degrees, the altitude was 8500'.

The flight back was as uneventful, peaceful, and beautiful as the flight over. Again, at about 20nm from Harvey I started my descent and again the timing worked out reasonably well. As I approached and listened to the radio traffic, I realized that Harvey Field had opened up the grass runway for use. I landed on the asphalt, but then decided to do a soft field take off and landing, as I hadn't done one since my initial training, let alone in Ariel.

The grass runway at Harvey is close to the asphalt runway. Technically it is runway 15R/33L and the asphalt is 15L/33R. In practice, it's treated more like a single runway with two surfaces to choose from. There is only one pattern, and each aircraft uses one or the other. There are no parallel operations.

The Musketeer airframe is rather robust so it handled the grass runway with ease. It was bumpy, but I think I did reasonably well on take off, holding the nose up, lifting off earlier than normal, then leveling out to build some airspeed before climbing out. My landing was a bit firmer than I'd like, but the plane soaked it up with no problem. I don't intend to use the grass for take off when I'm heavy, but it was cool to get some soft field practice in.

All in all, I was able to accomplish my objectives for this flight. I'm now confident that I can handle flying over to eastern Washington given good weather conditions. The most important aspect, I think, was the altitude. I've never been that high in an unpressurized aircraft. While the effect on my engine was obvious, I didn't observe any ill effects to myself. I was able to breathe normally and couldn't detect any issues caused by the reduced oxygen levels. This was expected, as I was still below the altitude at which supplemental oxygen is required, but only just. The regs require oxygen if you're between 10,000' and 12,000' for more than 30 minutes, and at all times above 12,000'. For my part, I don't intend to go above 10,000' at all without it.

On the way back, as I was looking out at the mountains and the blue sky with its occasional clouds, I came to understand that I was truly blessed to be able to do this. While millions, even billions of people have seen the world from that height, and even higher, only a relative few are able to do so at the controls of their own aircraft. Every time I fly, I'm grateful that I can do so, and I hope I never stop being so.

Here are some photos I took during the flight.























Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Approaching the annual

I know I haven't been posting much, but that's mainly because nothing much of note has been happening. I've been flying, but not really going anywhere in particular. The engine continues to run very well, and the plane is still solid. I was hoping to do more "destination" flying this year but, for whatever reason(s), it didn't really happen. Next year, hopefully.... On the horizon, though, is the annual inspection. It's already scheduled for mid-December, since the last annual is good to the end of that month. I've also arranged for it to be an owner-assisted annual. I'm told that every airplane owner should do this at least once and I can certainly understand why that is the case, even before I do it. I will be learning about my airplane in a way that nothing else will match and, incidentally, save some money at the same time. I'm looking forward to it. Leading up to the annual, I have been compiling a list of squawks that I want to take care ...

Thwarted

The plane is done being fixed again. Well, for the most part, but I'll get to that. The vacuum pump had indeed failed, so they replaced it. They also replaced the starboard fuel sump drain valve. Interestingly, I received an email yesterday from the shop with an invoice attached. It was for a credit to my account, which they gave me because they drained the fuel from the right tank. The invoice notes that 16 gallons were removed. The tank's capacity is almost 30 gallons, and I had filled it almost full on Sunday before my flight. So either they didn't credit me for all of the fuel in the tank, or it had continued to leak and had lost about 12 or so gallons over the course of a few days. I don't know which, but I'm not going to worry too much about it. I went out today to put some Camguard in the oil, run the engine, and possibly even go for a flight if the weather was nice enough. The grass runway and temporary taxiway are open so limited flight operations can proce...

Adding to the list

As noted in my previous post, my landing light isn't working anymore. The most likely reason is that the bulb simply burned out. It's an OG incandescent bulb. I don't know how old it is; I could probably go through the logs to see if it was ever replaced but I don't feel like it right now. I called up the shop and added this to the list of items to be addressed when they can get to it. I also inquired as to whether or not it makes sense to upgrade it to an LED bulb. As I understand it, there are LED bulbs available that are drop-in replacements. They cost a few hundred dollars, whereas a regular incancescent bulb is less than twenty. At some point in the next day or two the shop manager should be giving me a call so we can discuss the options. On an unrelated topic, I forgot to mention something in my previous post. My flight with my wife was the first time I used shot bags I purchased for ballast. With my wife and me in the front seats, and 40 gallons of fuel in the ta...