Skip to main content

The jab

Here in Washington State, everyone will become eligible for the Covid vaccine beginning April 15. Up to now, I haven't been eligible under state guidelines even though I'm over 50 years old. I don't meet any of the other requirements such as working in an environment where I might be exposed, taking care of someone who is more susceptible, and so on. At some point in the next couple days I'll try to set up an appointment. My preference is for one of the vaccines that require two doses (e.g. the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines) but, if it came down to it, I'd take the Johnson&Johnson one-dose vaccine despite it's lower (but still impressive) effectiveness.

Which brings us to flying. The FAA has said that pilots should not fly for 48 hours after receiving any Covid vaccine injection. So, for the two-dose vaccines, this means no flying for two days after the first dose, and again after the second dose. When I get an appointment, I'm going to try for one early in the week so that I won't be grounded on a weekend. Of course, this assumes the weather will cooperate on that weekend but that's out of my control.

By that measure, it would make sense to get the one-dose vaccine from J&J. And I may actually do that. It will depend in part on where I can get an appointment and what vaccine(s) they are offering. Not all vaccines are available at every location. For example, my primary care clinic is offering the J&J and Moderna vaccines, but not the one from Pfizer.

Flying is very heavily regulated, much more so than driving. And it's regulated at the federal level whereas driving is regulated mostly at the state level. These regulations may seem onerous but, unlike some other domains of government regulation, the FARs and directives from the FAA seem to be (at least mostly) driven by actual, practical concerns. For the most part, they make sense and are intended to promote safety, rather than exercise control for its own sake. Of course there are a lot of pilots who could fly safely immediately after receiving a dose of the vaccine, but some people are experiencing side effects that are serious enough so the FAA has decided not to take the chance. A 48-hour waiting period seems to be a reasonable compromise. There are, of course, some sections of the FARs that could stand some significant modernization, but that's a whole 'nother topic for another day.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Predicting the weather is hard

At least, it's hard for this region of the country. I like to say that predicting the weather for the Puget Sound region is far more an art than it is a science. Early last week, the weather forecast was for pretty much crappy weather for the foreseeable future. However, because of the chaotic nature of the atmosphere around here, especially at this time of year, the forecast is always subject to change. As it turns out, the weather was actually nice enough last Friday afternoon (December 17) that I was able to go up for about an hour and a half. One of the reasons I went up was because I had filled the tanks after the previous flight, and I wanted to burn off some fuel in case I was able to take my father flying while we visiting from Arizona. As I'm sure I've mentioned, the weight and balance of my plane is such that I'd be over maximum weight if I had a passenger in the front seat, the required ballast in the baggage compartment to stay within the forward CG limit, a...
1 comment
Read more

A digression, if I may...

The other night, after almost 50 years, the Saturn V was dethroned as the most powerful rocket ever successfully launched by humanity. I use the word "successfully" because the Soviet N1 rocket actually generated more thrust at liftoff, but all four launch attempts ended in failure. For the first time since Apollo 17, a true moon rocket lifted off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, carrying a spacecraft capable of carrying humans back to the moon. This Artemis mission is a test flight, so no astronauts are on board the Orion spacecraft. Despite that, it was a spectacular launch. Because the SLS launch vehicle has a higher thrust-to-weight ratio than the Saturn V, it rose from the launch pad much more quickly than it's predecessor. I think it's a bit heavier than the Space Shuttle, but it has more thrust due to an additional RS-25 engine, and more powerful solid rocket boosters. Watching it rise into the night sky, I was excited, but also a bit melancholy. This was ...
1 comment
Read more

Approaching the annual

I know I haven't been posting much, but that's mainly because nothing much of note has been happening. I've been flying, but not really going anywhere in particular. The engine continues to run very well, and the plane is still solid. I was hoping to do more "destination" flying this year but, for whatever reason(s), it didn't really happen. Next year, hopefully.... On the horizon, though, is the annual inspection. It's already scheduled for mid-December, since the last annual is good to the end of that month. I've also arranged for it to be an owner-assisted annual. I'm told that every airplane owner should do this at least once and I can certainly understand why that is the case, even before I do it. I will be learning about my airplane in a way that nothing else will match and, incidentally, save some money at the same time. I'm looking forward to it. Leading up to the annual, I have been compiling a list of squawks that I want to take care ...
Post a Comment
Read more