Skip to main content

Selecting an EFB app

When I got my license, there was no such thing as a smartphone, let alone an iPad. During my flying hiatus, I was aware that electronic flight bag apps for smartphones and tablets had come into being, but I never had the need to check them out. Once I decided to get current again, one of the first things I started looking at was the selection of EFB apps available for both iOS and Android devices.

Because I didn't want to commit to a subscription plan right away, I started out looking at the zero-cost options that were available. I settled on FltPlan Go, which is available for both iOS and Android devices. I could run it on my iPad Pro, and on my Android phone, though the Android version lacks a couple of features that the iOS version has. It works pretty well, and is relatively feature-rich. It's support for ADS-B is actually pretty nice, and the iOS version even has audible traffic alerts if another aircraft comes close enough. It only says the word "traffic" over and over again, though. I wish it included more information, like direction, distance, and altitude. The Garmin GTN 650 in the rental plane includes that, and it's really nice. Even so, it works great with my Stratux ADS-B receiver. But so do a lot of EFB apps.

Although it works pretty well, and is probably good enough for now, it does seem a bit unpolished. I wanted to see if any of the other apps available would suit me better. Of course, Foreflight is the daddy, the one that everyone (at least in the US) thinks of first when the topic of EFB apps comes up. I've heard a lot of good things about it, and I may still check it out in the near future.

Another app that has been recommended to me is Garmin Pilot. However, my understanding is that it is somewhat more proprietary than Foreflight, and my understanding is that it does not work with any ADS-B receivers other than those from Garmin. So that pretty much rules it out immediately.

To start, I've decided to try out FlyQ from Seattle Avionics. I've heard it compares well to Foreflight, and other popular apps, and one of their big selling points is that you are no more than two taps from any information you need. The pricing model appears a bit better than Foreflight's, in that it costs a bit less and the basic/VFR subscription plan provides a couple of features you don't get with Foreflight's basic plan. Take synthetic vision for example. Not that I should actually need it, since I'll be flying VFR, but if I ever mess up and end up in IFR conditions, it'll be helpful.

Like many such apps, FlyQ offers a 30-day free trial, which I started today. Hopefully I'll be able to fly once or twice during the trial period.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Predicting the weather is hard

At least, it's hard for this region of the country. I like to say that predicting the weather for the Puget Sound region is far more an art than it is a science. Early last week, the weather forecast was for pretty much crappy weather for the foreseeable future. However, because of the chaotic nature of the atmosphere around here, especially at this time of year, the forecast is always subject to change. As it turns out, the weather was actually nice enough last Friday afternoon (December 17) that I was able to go up for about an hour and a half. One of the reasons I went up was because I had filled the tanks after the previous flight, and I wanted to burn off some fuel in case I was able to take my father flying while we visiting from Arizona. As I'm sure I've mentioned, the weight and balance of my plane is such that I'd be over maximum weight if I had a passenger in the front seat, the required ballast in the baggage compartment to stay within the forward CG limit, a...
1 comment
Read more

A digression, if I may...

The other night, after almost 50 years, the Saturn V was dethroned as the most powerful rocket ever successfully launched by humanity. I use the word "successfully" because the Soviet N1 rocket actually generated more thrust at liftoff, but all four launch attempts ended in failure. For the first time since Apollo 17, a true moon rocket lifted off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, carrying a spacecraft capable of carrying humans back to the moon. This Artemis mission is a test flight, so no astronauts are on board the Orion spacecraft. Despite that, it was a spectacular launch. Because the SLS launch vehicle has a higher thrust-to-weight ratio than the Saturn V, it rose from the launch pad much more quickly than it's predecessor. I think it's a bit heavier than the Space Shuttle, but it has more thrust due to an additional RS-25 engine, and more powerful solid rocket boosters. Watching it rise into the night sky, I was excited, but also a bit melancholy. This was ...
1 comment
Read more

Approaching the annual

I know I haven't been posting much, but that's mainly because nothing much of note has been happening. I've been flying, but not really going anywhere in particular. The engine continues to run very well, and the plane is still solid. I was hoping to do more "destination" flying this year but, for whatever reason(s), it didn't really happen. Next year, hopefully.... On the horizon, though, is the annual inspection. It's already scheduled for mid-December, since the last annual is good to the end of that month. I've also arranged for it to be an owner-assisted annual. I'm told that every airplane owner should do this at least once and I can certainly understand why that is the case, even before I do it. I will be learning about my airplane in a way that nothing else will match and, incidentally, save some money at the same time. I'm looking forward to it. Leading up to the annual, I have been compiling a list of squawks that I want to take care ...
Post a Comment
Read more